Fashion Icon: Upset Toddlers   Archive   RSS
Two feminists with a love of gossip sites and an inability to "shut up" or "smile correctly" when gossip sites draw obscene images on pictures of 15 year olds or refer to bisexual men and women as attention seeking.

So we created this tumblr to talk about that.

The title of the blog comes from our mutual loathing of pictures of crying and/or upset celebrity children. We wish such pictures, like many of the things we highlight here, would disappear from the face of the earth.

“Go East!” US Vogue Sept 2011

US Vogue “explores China” in their newest issue.  Now, I do not want to put too fine a point on this but this editorial is terribly racist. I am going to talk about reasons one by one, just to help me keep them straight!

1) Chinese people are not a convient backdrop for a white model.  Vogue has done this before but in previous issues it was Natalia Vodianova in Russia or Joan Smalls in Puerto Rico.  It was a model set against the backdrop of her own community/country.  So when the people and culture became a literal backdrop to the clothes, it wasn’t quite so…awful.  But this!  This is a white American model using Chinese people and culture as a backdrop to sell Western designed clothes.  It smack of equal parts colonialism and appropriativeness.

1a) Photographing a white model towering over identically dressed Chinese garment workers is just gross.

2) I do not understand why, if Vogue wanted to do this story, they did not hire a Chinese national as the model.  There are not a lot of Chinese models in high fashion, but there are a handful.  And I certainly believe that Liu Wen is talented enough, and famous enough, to carry this editorial. 

3) I am especially disturbed by the way that Vogue “exoticized” the model’s features.  This is a clear example of “having your cake and eating it too”. You hire a white model but then through hair (a short black wig) and makeup and lighting that change the appearance of her eyes and cheekbones, you transform an “all-American girl” into a model who can be read as “Asian but not too Asian”.  I simply don’t understand this make-up choice in any way that is not racist. 

A picture of the featured model, for comparison’s sake.

If you were maybe planning to buy this issue, I urge you not to.  This kind of racism underlying the decisions that went into a shoot like this should not be rewarded with your money. The presentation of this editorial, from the staging to the make-up uses tropes of colonialism, the white beauty standard and appropriation to make its points. 

August 19th, 2011   10 notes